<p>Tweety is to AI what the King of France is to philosophy <br />— ur <cite>Generic Information and Dependent Generics</cite> av Godehard Link </p>

<p>Det är en humla på toan. </p>

<p>A dog was everywhere. <br />— ur <cite>A unified analysis of the English bare plural</cite> av Greg N. Carlson </p> <p>A wolf gets bigger as you go north from here. <br />— ur <cite>A unified analysis of the English bare plural</cite> av Greg N. Carlson </p> <p>This kind of animal ruled Serenia for 500 years. <br />— ur <cite>A unified analysis of the English bare plural</cite> av Greg N. Carlson </p>

<p>For the conclusion to be true, however, Barry would need to have organized his life so that dancing is his chosen vocation, or at least one of his avocations. <br />— ur <cite>Generics: Cognition and Acquisition</cite> av Sarah-Jane Leslie </p>

<p>Tweety does no fly (perhaps Tweety is a penguin, or a baby bird) <br />— ur <cite>Nonmonotonic Logic</cite> av John~F.~Horty </p>

<p>First-order logic is very robust about questions like these: it doesn't give a damn. <br />— ur <cite>Classical Logic I: First-Order Logic</cite> av Wilfrid Hodges </p>

<p>I promised simplicity; I deliver functions from functions from functions to function to functions from function to functions. <br />— ur <cite>General Semantics</cite> av David Lewis </p>

<p>Drunks are less reliable sources of information than your average passerby. <br />— ur <cite>Evidence that Stakes Don't Matter for Evidence</cite> av Ram Neta och Mark Phelan </p>

<p>Perhaps we can compare many of the attempts to formalize with the use of an airplane to visit a friend living in the same town. <br />— ur <cite>On formalization</cite> av Hao Wang </p>

<p>I will mention three facts by way of justifying my making this assumption: (a) I believe it to be true; (b) I find the alternative unintelligible; (c) I can't do everything in one paper. <br />— ur <cite>When Are Objects Parts?</cite> av Peter van Inwagen </p>

<p>Såg en som läste pocketbok samtidigt som han cyklade när jag cyklade hem från biblioteket. När jag mötte honom kollade han upp från boken kort och korrigerade styrningen. </p>

<p>Han [John Ausonius] har talat om Berettapistolen med värme i rösten – den enda gången han givit uttryck för någon känsla. <br />— ur <cite>Lasermannen: En berättelse om Sverige</cite> av Gellert Tamas </p>

<p>Objektet gick liksom i en egen värld, gick fram och tillbaka i rummet som ett djur i en bur, pratade med sig själv och gjorde karateliknande utfall, och höll händerna i gevärs- och pistolfattning mot fönstret. <br />— ur <cite>Lasermannen: En berättelse om Sverige</cite> av Gellert Tamas </p> <p>Spanarna noterade att de båda männen klädde sig »allt annat än diskret«. En av dem bar en kamouflagefärgad jacka, den andra såg ut som en nazistisk officer från 1930-talet. <br />— ur <cite>Lasermannen: En berättelse om Sverige</cite> av Gellert Tamas </p>

<p>a man driving down a normal road stops at every house entrance to make sure that no dog is about to issue form it at breakneck speed, we should not naturally describe him as »driving carefully,« nor would we naturally ascribe carefulness to a bank clerk who counted up the notes he was about to hand to a customer fifteen times. <br />— ur <cite>Prolegomena</cite> av Paul Grice </p> <p>The knowledge of and ability to remember such things as one's name and phone number is one of the foundation stones of modern organized society <br />— ur <cite>Prolegomena</cite> av Paul Grice </p>

<p>It wasn't a case of identifying passing structuralists ostensively by their surface appearance and hoping that one day scientific investigation would reveal their true nature. <br />— ur <cite>Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind</cite> av John Searle </p>

<p>Har svårt att koncentrera mig om jag tuggar tuggummi samtidigt som jag gör läxa. </p>

<p>If one says »I apologize« one can thereby apologize, but if one says »I fry an egg« no egg is so far fried. Perhaps God could fry an egg simply by uttering such a performative sentence, but we can't. Why not? <br />— ur <cite>Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind</cite> av John Searle </p>

<p>but the stomachache makes him angry and because of this anger, he kills the next man he sees <br />— ur <cite>Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind</cite> av John Searle </p>

<p>Läser en läxbok som luktar inrökt gardin. När jag har läst i den kan jag känna lukten på mina fingrar. Ställer den på fönsterbrädet med pärmarna vidöppna, så sidorna spretar, för att vädra den över natten. Om jag hade haft en väderskyddad balkong så hade jag förvarat den där. </p>

<p>Entire philosophical movements have been built around theories of Intentionality. What is one to do in the face of all this distinguished past? My own approach has been simply to ignore it, partly out of ignorance of most of the traditional writings on Intentionality and partly out of the conviction that my only hope of resolving the worries which led me into this study in the first place lay in the relentless pursuit of my own investigations. <br />— ur <cite>Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind</cite> av John Searle </p>

<p>Physicists seek a set of basic laws simple enough that one might write them on the front of a T-shirt; in a theory of consciousness, we should expect the same thing. <br />— ur <cite>The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory</cite> av David J. Chalmers </p>

<p>In particular, it denies the evidence of our own experience. This is the sort of thing that can only be done by a philosopher—or by someone else tying themselves in intellectual knots. <br />— ur <cite>The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory</cite> av David J. Chalmers </p>